I'm trained in law, I find it interesting, but am also a bit of a political junky. I pushed my employer for ages to give me some experience in policy, and now that's what I'm doing.
These are pretty nice people. I'm the only lawyer. My boss chats to me about wine, my nearest co-worker updates me on her pregnancy, which is at that late 'he's playing drums on my belly again' sort of stage. The pay's more than adequate. In the past couple of months I've already added a plethora of experiences to my CV: I've written part of a speech, drafted bits of legislation, written explanatory memoranda and ministerial documents, and spoken at meetings as the legal guy.
It's law, but definitely leading me in the direction of policy, law reform, and ultimately politics. A new direction, one I find very attractive.
Opportunities have suddenly brewed elsewhere. Specifically advocacy- running litigation in Court. There are a couple of these potential opportunities, and they would be ideal for building a career as a courtroom lawyer, something I have aspired to for years. They are in very interesting and sought after areas of law, blending criminal law with complex white collar issues. Long term this path would also lead to a lot more money. Exponentially more.
I could be making a decision that will be almost irreversible, and will shape my future for decades. Both of which lead to things that I've wanted to do, both are interesting.
Having good options can be more stressful than picking the best from a bad bunch, because the potential to squander a fantastic opportunity is so strong.
Sorry to be so navel gazing. After reading my blog, would you point me in either direction, or toss a coin?
When co-operation and compromise in politics are stigmatised - We also see outrageous voices wielding disproportionate influence in elections, independently vetting candidates, anointing or tarring the contestants, par...
1 hour ago