Just hand them over to her father, together with a crown-sealed immunity from the A-G. What would be suitable punishment for this? Death? Crippling with an iron bar?
Why do these animals disgrace us by sharing our DNA?
UPDATE: It's now a rape investigation. Good. Go to hell in a handbasket, you little vomitbags.
UPDATE II- Thoughts on YouTube:
The video in question is allegedly footage of an underage rape. People say companies like YouTube cannot be restrained, they are too big, it is impossible for them to police everything put onto their site. But they are lying.
It is impossible for them to police everything if they refuse to spend money employing people to police it.
There is also the question of whether we need the technology at all. Oh it's fun, hip, insane, get-out-of-the-way progress. Progress that includes film after film taken without the consent of the leading characters. Films at the vanguard of free speech, pushing the boundaries. Y'know, films of schoolgirls punching each other in the face, or of thugs urinating on and sexually assaulting a young girl.
We can block paedophilia can't we? Why not this trash? Leering footage of sexual assaults on underage girls qualifies for censorship in my humble opinion...
Capabilities as menus: A non-welfarist basis for QALY evaluation (Crosspost from Crooked Timber) - This is a contribution to a discussion of Sen’s capability approach, taking place at Crooked Timber. It’s a bit too wonkish for the CT readership, it seems...
2 hours ago