I've thought this many times, and now Barnaby Joyce has queried whether businesses with over 100 employees will artificially attract the unfair dismissal exemption by use of dodgy accounting structures.
Can I add- I wonder how many people realise that for these purposes Starbucks, McDonalds, 7/11 and other multinationals are likely to be exempt, because the business, I'd wage money on it, is defined to be the individual franchise.
How many people would support the idea that McDonalds gets an exemption for being a small business?
I haven't had time to fisk the legislation, so please correct me if I'm wrong.
Meanwhile we should ask why Labor have not been identifying this, don't they remember the Waterfront Case which involved the same sort of form-over-substance chicanery?
Beazley and Combet are right that this is a fairly small part of an overall monster attack on workers. However they appear to be underestimating both its potential for exploitation and how much it might piss Joe and Josette Average off to realise they are being hoodwinked.
Meanwhile, as usual, the Speaker is busy abusing his power to advantage his party.
Poor outfields and a bit of rain; ratings 24th August - 4th TestWest IndiesvIndia Pre-rating 824.1 1197.5 Form -27.6 +41.2 Expected Margin India by 96 runs Actual Margin Match drawn Post-rating 826.1 1195.4 Serie...
14 hours ago