tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14608966.post113980615113546430..comments2024-03-24T00:22:04.029+11:00Comments on armagnac'd: 2 out of 3 women against choice are LABORArmagnyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05430006925445661524noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14608966.post-1140993299997002282006-02-27T09:34:00.000+11:002006-02-27T09:34:00.000+11:00Well if you want to split hairs, it's a vote again...Well if you want to split hairs, it's a vote against extending choice, or including another option.<BR/><BR/>From a 'moral' standpoint such opposition only seems to be based on numbers- i.e. ease of access means more use. However you'd think there'd be a more persuasive argument that says it is better to happen right at the outset when the embyo is least formed.Armagnac Esqhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01365787889351188089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14608966.post-1140860467536930002006-02-25T20:41:00.000+11:002006-02-25T20:41:00.000+11:00Why is voting against ru486 a vote against choice?...Why is voting against ru486 a vote against choice? I've never had that adequately explained. We've already got the choice to abort or not.Nilkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13872495050796257177noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14608966.post-1139894276200770192006-02-14T16:17:00.000+11:002006-02-14T16:17:00.000+11:00yeerse...well... the SDA... hmmm....yeerse...well... the SDA... hmmm....Armagnac Esqhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01365787889351188089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14608966.post-1139892715133735512006-02-14T15:51:00.000+11:002006-02-14T15:51:00.000+11:00Why does that surprise?There are liberals in the L...Why does that surprise?<BR/><BR/>There are liberals in the Liberal parties and some Laborites are from very conservative backgrounds. For example, the SDA.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14608966.post-1139870991068286752006-02-14T09:49:00.000+11:002006-02-14T09:49:00.000+11:00=)Jericho's right about winning, and so what would...=)<BR/><BR/>Jericho's right about winning, and so what would happen is that the two parties would coalition.<BR/><BR/>But in a way this is how the factions should, and to some extent do, operate. Do they need to split into separate parties, or would a rejig that allowed for a little more open dissent in the party be the trick?<BR/><BR/>Thing is, even the right is quite split on these issues I think you'll find.Armagnac Esqhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01365787889351188089noreply@blogger.com